Literary theory and literary criticism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Literary hypothesis and literary critical review - adjudicate ExampleThese different lenses allow critics to consider works of art based on some assumptions within that school of theory. In addition, these lenses enable critics on particular aspects of work they consider vital. For instance, a critic operative on Marxist theory might focus on how the characters in a story act based on their economic situation while a critic working on post-colonial theory might consider the same story but look at how characters from colonial powers treat those from the colonies (Makaryk, 77). everywhere time, different literature schools of literary criticism have developed, each with its own approaches to the act of reading (Davis, 66). impudent criticism assumes that the literary work is autonomous. This autonomy is a concept that can be explicated so as to discover its organic unity and the relationship between medium and message. Although critics, philosophers, authors and educators have been writing since ancient times, modern schools of literary theory have cohered from these discussions and now influence how scholars look at and write about literature. This slit focuses on the focuses on the major schools of literary criticism (Davis, 98). 1) Formalist approach Formalist approach was developed as a answer to the 19th century confusion that marked the work of literature and biography, morality or philosophical system (Culler, 109). It entails an explicit look at the components of a work which helps an individual to enter a text pull down if the he does not agree with the orders aesthetic, apolitical, disinterested, reserved judgment concerning the inwardness. This is a literacy criticism method that not only applies to texts but also to movies (Culler, 19). The following is the basic grammatical construction of analyzing a literary content using formalist approach, specifically through answering these basic questions a) Plot, narrative line and plain sense Is in that location any action? How important is the action and why? What is the nature and significance of the action? Is the overall structure of the movie appropriate to the content? And is the action compressed, large and diffuse or episodic? What is the basic speckle structure? Is it melodramatic, dramatic, impasse, linear or a variation or a combination or rapine on these forms? And why? How is the conflict created? What is the nature of the conflict? Why? What is the meaning of the story line? Is the speckle probable or plausible? b) Character (s) What is the motivation structure of the character? What roles are figure outed by the minor characters, if any? Are the characters individuals or types? Why? Is there existence of character contrasts or parallels? c) finical effects Who tells the story? Is there a characteristic use of language? What is the language of the author? General, plain, metaphorical, precise, effusive, repetitious, economical, true-to-life(prenomin al) and naturalistic? What role is played by the setting, physical description or dramatic scene play? Is there an existence of deep structure such as mythic or archetypal modes that underlies the go forth of the work? d) Emotional effects What emotional effects occur? To what extend? What is the relationship of the emotional response to the plot or situation and characters 2) Reader-Response Criticism The literary criticism theory was developed in the premature 1960s and has been applicable up to the present. The most known proponents of this theory include Peter Rabinowitz, Stanley Fish, Elizabeth Freund, David Bleich, Normal Holland, Louise Rosenblatt, Wolfgang Iser and Hans Rober Jauss (Davis, 22). Basically, reader-response criticism considers readers/viewers reaction to literature as vital to interpreting the meaning of