Theory Comparrison

Write 550- to 750 Provide a formal commentary for ethical motive with citations, references etc. Describe the differences between theories Describe the similarities between each(prenominal) theory Describe how each theory addresses ethics and trueity Tell me based on your own morals and ethics, which theories do you call you most closely follow in your life ( there is no sound or wrong answer) morals is the science of right and wrong in human action. (Boylan, 2009). Many theories exist that explores how pile come to what they call up is the right or wrong decision.A few examples include virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and deontology. Virtue ethics position is that we find veracious when we cultivate excellence (virtue) by pursuing the moderate course between excess and defect. (Boylan, 2009, p. 133) This basically means that this theory considers how humans should interact with each other meaning that there is a right way and a wrong way. Utilitarianism suggests that an ac tion is morally right when that action produces more total public utility company for the group as a consequence than any other alternative does (Boylan, 2009, p. 53) Those who practice utilitarianism take into comity all of the consequences and each action. Utilitarianism can be divided into two theories act and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is the explanation of utilitarianism that says that each moral situation should be subjected to the utilitarian formula the greatest good for the greatest number. (Boylan, 2009, p. 164) This fancy of ethical decision making seems to be the least emotional due to the fact that it is pure come in the equation. This might hurt one person but more people will service from it.Rule utilitarianism says that each moral situation should be guided first by prima facie rules (that themselves are confirm by utilitarianism). Thus, the agent assesses a situation on act utilitarian principles but within a framework of prima facie rules that can override apparent act-utilitarian outcomes. (Boylan, 2009, p. 164) Unlike, act utilitarianism, rule utilitarianism considers injustices of an psyche for the great good whereas act utilitarianism does not. Deontology is the moral theory that suggests that an agents duty is based upon principle.The theory bases its duties on the character of human reason or on the nature of human action. It asserts the existence of moral facts and so is a moral realist theory. (Boylan, 2009, p. 171) This idea goes along with the notion that each person has a built in moral code. A person will do the right thing even though they know there will consequences. There are similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. Each theory has its own ideas regarding ethics and morality regarding the individual and rescript.Consequences and benefits differ with each theory. Virtue theory states that humans have virtues for the sake of what is good and right and t hese virtues are the supreme human good. Virtues drive our t reverseencies for behavior and control how we feel and interpet things. Living a good life is living a virtuous life within society. A persons actions are the direct results and reflection of an individuals morals and virtues. Utilitarian theory is concerned with the upper limit benefit or good for the greatest number of people.The outcome with the greatest benefits for greatest numbers is ever so the desired result. However, the greatest good for the majority should not come at the expense of harming the minority. The minority whitethorn have to endure some individual sacrifice so that the greatest numbers in society can realize the greatest good. Deontology is concerned with the meaning behind ethical decisions and conduct instead of end results or outcome. It looks at how an individual is obligated to act in terms of right and wrong conduct.It is the individuals duty and obligation to follow the law and it is acceptabl e to harm some people for the greater good and benefit. Utilitarian theory is less concerned with the individual because all that matters is an outcome the benefits the most people. It focuses more on actions of the majority to create the greatest good and outcome. However, there is always a minority and those people will not always benefit under this system. The majority needs to have good set and morals for society to flourish and benefit. Virtue and deontology theories have more focus on the individual and.